Re: Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable?
Date
Msg-id 200105101339.f4ADdiv19279@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable?  (Alexander Klimov <ask@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il>)
List pgsql-hackers
We worked around the Ultrix /bin/sh problem for initdb.  If that is the
only place there is a problem, we can keep the fix for 7.2.


> On 8 May 2001, Doug McNaught wrote:
> 
> > Alexander Klimov <ask@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> writes:
> > 
> > > Hi.
> > > 
> > > On some systems /bin/sh is not Burne Shell, e.g. /bin/sh is tcsh, but
> > 
> > *violent retching sounds*
> > 
> > IMHO, any system where /bin/sh doesn't point to an at-least-somewhat
> > Bourne-compatible shell is broken by definition...  Who perpetrated
> > this atrocity?
> 
> Sorry, I was misleaded by
> >sh -c 'echo $SHELL'
> /bin/tcsh
> 
> The /bin/sh is sh, but not SysV compatible -- there is /bin/sh5 for that.
> 
> Regards,
> ASK
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Klaus Reger
Date:
Subject: Converting PL/SQL to PL/PGSQL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: date conversion (was Re: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...)