Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
Date
Msg-id Pine.OSF.4.61.0503111018210.164442@kosh.hut.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Would those of you with access to other DBMSes try this:
>
> create table tab (col integer);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
> insert into tab values(1);
> insert into tab values(2);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
>
> I claim that a SQL-conformant database will return 0, 1, 0, and 1 rows
> from the 4 selects --- that is, the contents of tab make no difference
> at all.  (MySQL returns 0, 0, 0, and 2 rows, so they are definitely
> copying our mistake...)

DB2 (version 8.1) gives 0, 1, 0, 1.

- Heikki


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laszlo Hornyak
Date:
Subject: Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
Next
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies