Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
Date
Msg-id 42316AB2.3060903@mailblocks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies  (Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Laszlo Hornyak wrote:

>The default should be the default used by PostgreSQL, and the extra ones
>should be commented out under it.
>Not the most user friendly solution, but can we do anything else?
>  
>
Yes, we can do as I suggested and select mapping depending on the GUC 
variable "integer_datetimes". I guess you have some initial handshake 
between the postgresql backend and the JVM where you can negotiate 
things like that?

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer (+