On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I think Peter's idea of offering Subversion as an alternative in
>> pgfoundry is very good.
>
> Mmm, do you mean createing periodically "snapshot"? Yes this could be
> a good idea.
No, I mean that each project could choose to use either cvs or svn, like
they do at Apache.
Sure, if you could have both, that would be even better.
>> I like subversion very much, but one thing that troubles me a bit is the
>> number of extra libraries required to compile and run it. Also, is there
>> pre-compiled binaries for all the platforms that PostgreSQL supports?
>
> I don't know about the server, but for sure what is more important here is
> the
> client side and now that the win environment matter more then before, I have
> to
> say that TortoiseSVN ( tortoisesvn.tigris.org ) is much better then WinCVS.
True. Looking at the Subversion downloads page, they seem to have binaries
for various Linux distributions, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD, Solaris,
Mac OS X and Win32. According to the supported platforms chapter in
pgsql documentation, we also support AIX, BSD/OS, HP-UX, IRIX, Tru64
UNIX, UnixWare, and Linux on Alpha, arm41, m64, MIPS, PPC, S/390 and
Sparc.
Developers on those platforms would have to compile subversion themselves,
or compile pgsql from source tarballs.
Have you looked at TortoiseCVS (www.tortoisecvs.org)? I think TortoiseSVN
is a fork of that.
- Heikki
