Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ian Barwick
Subject Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date
Msg-id 1d581afe041105104247e2db8e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:22:55 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> > I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this
> > discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use
> > the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we
> > need to change I'll take lots more notice.
> 
> I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain
> traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB
> backend that it uses.

Aha, glad I'm not the only one. Version 1.1 has a flat-file based
backend which is not prone to BDB-permission-related problems, see:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.4 .
It's only been around a few months though and the docs mention
possible issues with scalability.

Ian Barwick
barwick@gmail.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die