Re: [HACKERS] Execution time. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Execution time.
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.3.95.980204113746.24451W-100000@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Execution time.  (Shiby Thomas <sthomas@cise.ufl.edu>)
Responses Is this a parser error ?  (Shiby Thomas <sthomas@cise.ufl.edu>)
Re: [HACKERS] Execution time.  (Shiby Thomas <sthomas@cise.ufl.edu>)
Error in select  (Shiby Thomas <sthomas@cise.ufl.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Shiby Thomas wrote:

>
> => > I invoked postmaster as:
> => >  postmaster -B 30000 -o "-s -F -S 16384"
> =>                  ^^^^^
> => 240M of shared memory ?!
> =>
> Is the size of the hash bucket dependent on the number of buffers available ?
> If so, with -B 30000, it might create huge hash buckets and hence the
> hash join could degenerate to a nested loops join. Is that possible -- just
> checking. What could be good values for -B and -S. The largest table I am
> joining is about 60M

    My production server runs with a -B 256, and a -S 10240



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shiby Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Execution time.
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Best problem report *I've* ever seen ... NAWT!!