Re: ext3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rich Shepard
Subject Re: ext3
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.61.0501171650240.19599@salmo.appl-ecosys.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ext3  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
Responses Re: ext3
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, David Garamond wrote:

> So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best
> speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time. I
> also tend to avoid reiser3, it has given us many griefs in the past. XFS?

dave,

   I have no large databases here, but I run reiserfs on must systems and
ext3 on my notebook. Over the past couple of years I've had no problems with
either. I've read of folks who don't like one or the other, but locally I
know of no one who's experienced any negative situations with either.

Rich

--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. (TM)
<http://www.appl-ecosys.com>   Voice: 503-667-4517   Fax: 503-667-8863

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Garamond
Date:
Subject: Re: ext3
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: ext3