Re: ext3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: ext3
Date
Msg-id 41EC5E55.9040006@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ext3  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
Responses Re: ext3  (Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
David Garamond wrote:

> Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
>> I recommend you don't use ext3 for any database:
>> http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0641.html
>>
>> apparently its still buggy.
>
>
> So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best
> speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time.
> I also tend to avoid reiser3, it has given us many griefs in the past.
> XFS?

We have had success with XFS and JFS. XFS seems a little better supported.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>
> Regards,
> dave
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>               http://archives.postgresql.org



--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rich Shepard
Date:
Subject: Re: ext3
Next
From: "Frank D. Engel, Jr."
Date:
Subject: Re: ext3