> I thought the syntax came from Berkeley. We can add ALSO if folks like
> it. I can't think of cases where we have keywords for both on and off
> behavior, and allow a default if the keyword is missing.
ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT ... [ RESTRICT | CASCADE ]
CREATE TABLE ... [ WITH OIDS | WITHOUT OIDS ]
CREATE USER [ CREATEDB | NOCREATEDB ] ...
IMHO, from the language design point of view, it seems better if all
options have a name.
--
Fabien.
