Tom Lane wrote:
> Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
> > Most of the patch deals with the documentation, which is rather ugly
> > because it keeps telling about "INSTEAD" vs "non-INSTEAD" rules, as there
> > is no name for the default behavior. I think "ALSO" fixes this issue as it
> > clarifies the explanations.
>
> Hmm ... I find that argument much more convincing than any of the others
> ...
>
> Jan, what do you think? You invented this command's syntax IIRC.
I thought the syntax came from Berkeley. We can add ALSO if folks like
it. I can't think of cases where we have keywords for both on and off
behavior, and allow a default if the keyword is missing.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
