Re: SHOW ALL output too wide - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Dennis Bjorklund |
---|---|
Subject | Re: SHOW ALL output too wide |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0511261640020.25251-100000@zigo.dhs.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: SHOW ALL output too wide (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: SHOW ALL output too wide
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > See the discussion or really solo request by me for more feedback when > this change was made for 8.1: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00295.php > > Where were you when I asked? I do not work with postgresql like you do and can't follow everything, that's just how life is. I've not used 8.1 much until recently, and that's when I noticed the new behaviour. I spend about 10 hours per week helping the pg project, mostly by giving support in the #postgresql irc channel. That's about all the time I am prepared to give. The main use I have of the SHOW ALL command it to tell people to run it to show me what settings they have. > Didn't you notice it in the release notes that have been online for > months? > > * Make "SHOW ALL" include variable descriptions (Matthias Schmidt) And you except me to understand from that line that the output from SHOW ALL is much harder for me to read now then it was before? I brought it up as soon as I knew about it. I don't think it's fair of you to demand that I keep my mouth shut just because I can't follow the development of pg as close as you can. But of course, if someone wants to pay my for working full time on pg I would be very happy :-) > It is unlikely this will be changed in any 8.1.X release. If you want it > modified for 8.2, we will need to see more than one person complaining > about it, because until now no one has complained about the documented > 8.1 change. Then I hope that when people notice it they will also speak up (if they dare to do so now given that they missed the discussion you speak of above). I agree that for 8.1.x we only want bug fixes (as always, unless there are very, very many complaints). > If you can find a sufficient number of people who like the VERBOSE idea I don't like the verbose idea. I think commands like that don't belong in the server at all. Different clients have different needs. For example I prefer that the \d command is implemented by psql and not by a DESCRIBE command. I don't want a lot of different server commands that present things in different ways for different clients. SHOW need to stay because there have always been a SHOW command, but do we really want to build in more things like that? What I would want is one of: * Revert to the old SHOW ALL command * Implement a \show in psql that can do more then a server command if we want it to. My motivation is only for the good of postgresql. If the majority want something else then that's what should happen (of course). I'm just stating my view, nothing less and nothing more. -- /Dennis Björklund
pgsql-hackers by date: