Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results
Date
Msg-id 3903.1133024001@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> ...and for emphasis: this optimization of SeqScans is not possible with
>> any other database system, so its a big win for PostgreSQL.

> With any other db system?  That's a big call.  Why?

One could equally well spin it negatively, as "this optimization is not
needed with any other database" ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Bjorklund
Date:
Subject: Re: SHOW ALL output too wide
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results