On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Matt Davies wrote:
>
> Acceptance of PG could be greatly accelerated by more:
> 1. small projects using PG as a backend (as stated in previous thread post)
> 2. documenation coming from multiple sources. Don't ask me to explain why, but
> one seems to equate robustness, usability, etc... with the more titles one
> sees. If you go to Barnes and Noble's and look there for DB books you see the
> wall of red (Oracle books), black (M$oft), blue (MySQL). I simply point out
> that perception being as it is - PG is not there. I am trying to learn more and
> more about it to remedy my newcomer understanding of PG. Do not read this as if
> I am a newbie to DB's; I am not ignorant.
>
I have just gone to www.barnesandnoble.com , and, searched on
postgresql, and got 13 results - including the famous and
previously mentioned "Teach Yourself PostgreSQL in 21 Days", by Chris
Smith, published in December 2002!
:)
--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..............
"So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep Thought,
Chapter 28 of
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
A Trilogy In Four Parts",
written by Douglas Adams,
published by Pan Books, 1992
....................................................
