Greg,
if you're still in bitmap indices you may take a look on our
contrib/intarray module.
Regards,
Oleg
On 13 Mar 2002, Greg Copeland wrote:
> One of the reasons why I originally stated following the hackers list is
> because I wanted to implement bitmap indexes. I found in the archives,
> the follow link, http://www.it.iitb.ernet.in/~rvijay/dbms/proj/, which
> was extracted from this,
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=01C0EF67.5105D2E0.mascarm%40mascari.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dbitmap%2Bindex%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.hackers%26hl%3Den%26selm%3D01C0EF67.5105D2E0.mascarm%2540mascari.com%26rnum%3D1,
archivethread.
>
> At any rate, that was some number of months ago. I've started looking
> at the results posted from their bitmap GiST efforts and found that they
> were being tested rather poorly to be of real value (I also found it
> annoying that the project seems to quote other people's work without
> giving credit). Nonetheless, I thought I'd post to find out if anyone
> feels there is still a need for this? That is, I'm not really sure that
> data warehousing or DDS systems are currently very common with Postgres.
>
> If the group here still see value in adding various types of bitmap
> support, can someone please point me to some documentation. I had
> several bookmarked but lost then when X crashed. Anything that outlines
> cache strategy, index support, am overview, and any other documentation
> that would help excel my understanding of the code as well as the
> various structure relationships would be wonderful?
>
> Oh yes, one last question, is the required method for adding index
> support via GiST? I ask because it seems to me that inserts could be
> exceptionally expensive, though as usual, I still have more to look at.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
>
> P.S. And yes, I have been reading lots of code...including
> walk-throughs! :P
>
>
>
