Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Kris Jurka
Subject Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0312291508020.30299-100000@leary.csoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?  (Nikola Milutinovic <Nikola.Milutinovic@ev.co.yu>)
Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc

On 29 Dec 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:

> As we are going to be moving to gborg, it is an opportunity to do some
> reorganization, one way of simplifying the driver is to drop support for
> some old jvm's.
>
> Is this a problem for anyone?

This is more of a general user survey for how the driver is used and
developed.  With the upcoming physical move of the driver source code to
http://gborg.postgresql.org/ from the main project's cvs repository we
were wondering if there are other changes that should be made?  For
example:

What JVMs does the latest version of the driver need to support?  Are you
likely to upgrade your 7.1 database to 7.4 without upgrading the JVM at
the same time?

What server versions does the latest version of the driver need to
support?  Are you using a driver from a new server against an older one to
get some of the fixes/features or do you just download/build the driver
for the server version you are on?

What features are you sorely in need of that are either unimplemented or
don't work as advertised?

What parts of the documentation are poor or missing?

Kris Jurka



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: getBinaryStream/setBinaryStream 7.2<->7.4 Question
Next
From: Harry Schittler
Date:
Subject: Re: getBinaryStream/setBinaryStream 7.2<->7.4 Question