Re: PlPython - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: PlPython
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0306261048161.1058-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PlPython  (DeJuan Jackson <djackson@speedfc.com>)
List pgsql-general
Because rexec was considered so broken by Guido that it was removed in its
entirety.  Hopefully some day it will be readded in a more secure form,
and then the plpython module can be reinstated as a trusted language.

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, DeJuan Jackson wrote:

> Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it
> need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected.
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Patch applied.  Thanks.
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >Kevin Jacobs wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Kevin Jacobs wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I've worked with the Pl/Python code in the past and will see about removing
> >>>rexec and making it an untrusted language.  Last time I looked, it didn't
> >>>look particularly difficult.  I've set aside some time next week, so stay
> >>>tuned.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Attached is a patch that removes all of the RExec code from plpython from
> >>the current PostgreSQL CVS.  In addition, plpython needs to be changed to an
> >>untrusted language in createlang.  Please let me know if there are any
> >>problems.
> >>
> >>Best regards,
> >>-Kevin
> >>
> >>--
> >>--
> >>Kevin Jacobs
> >>The OPAL Group - Enterprise Systems Architect
> >>Voice: (216) 986-0710 x 19         E-mail: jacobs@theopalgroup.com
> >>Fax:   (216) 986-0714              WWW:    http://www.theopalgroup.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Content-Description:
> >
> >[ Attachment, skipping... ]
> >
> >
> >
> >>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> >>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: DeJuan Jackson
Date:
Subject: Re: PlPython
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PlPython