Re: PlPython - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PlPython
Date
Msg-id 26428.1056646754@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PlPython  (DeJuan Jackson <djackson@speedfc.com>)
Responses Re: PlPython
List pgsql-general
DeJuan Jackson <djackson@speedfc.com> writes:
> Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it
> need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected.

Now that the rexec code is gone, it MUST be marked untrusted --- this is
not a question for debate.  Installing it as trusted would be a security
hole.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PlPython
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: PlPython