Re: PlPython - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: PlPython
Date
Msg-id 1056648207.753.29.camel@haggis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PlPython  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PlPython  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PlPython  (Jason Earl <jason.earl@simplot.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 11:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> DeJuan Jackson <djackson@speedfc.com> writes:
> > Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it
> > need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected.
>
> Now that the rexec code is gone, it MUST be marked untrusted --- this is
> not a question for debate.  Installing it as trusted would be a security
> hole.

In what version is rexec removed?  v2.3?  If so, then there are
many people with Python 2.2 and even 2.1 who could still use
trusted PlPython.

--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.     Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA   http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
|                                                           |
| "Oh, great altar of passive entertainment, bestow upon me |
|  thy discordant images at such speed as to render linear  |
|  thought impossible" (Calvin, regarding TV)               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PlPython
Next
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: adding fields to a table