On Wed, 21 May 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 02:34:19PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
> > I beleive they are referring to the difference between VACUUM and VACUUM
> > FULL. The former is faster and doesn't lock tables, but the latter is
> > required to solve transaction wraparound.
>
> It is? I didn't think VACUUM FULL was ever required.
I'm not sure if it's vacuum full or vacuum, but I do know you have to
vacuum ALL the tables in ALL your databases to prevent wrap around.
Full or not, I'm not really sure. But I run fulls every night anyway.
