Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: VACUUM and transaction ID wraparound - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: VACUUM and transaction ID wraparound
Date
Msg-id 20030521205721.GZ17292@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM and transaction ID wraparound  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: VACUUM and transaction ID wraparound  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: VACUUM and transaction ID wraparound  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 02:34:19PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

> I beleive they are referring to the difference between VACUUM and VACUUM
> FULL. The former is faster and doesn't lock tables, but the latter is
> required to solve transaction wraparound.

It is?  I didn't think VACUUM FULL was ever required.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: nolan@celery.tssi.com
Date:
Subject: Re: DBI connection to multiple database
Next
From: Dave Krieger
Date:
Subject: Re: FIXED: Building 7.1.3 on Solaris 2.6