Re: psql and output from \? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: psql and output from \?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0203111831060.690-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql and output from \?  (Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: psql and output from \?  (Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ian Barwick writes:

> So with no further ado I humbly submit the attached patch, which builds on
> your patch and tidies up / harmonises the \? output.

That looks a lot better.  A few things, though:

The change to \a seems to be wrong-headed.

The line for \du speaks of "configured" users.  There are no
"unconfigured" users.

\set should be \set [NAME [VALUE]], or strictly speaking even \set [NAME
[VALUE [...]]].

Some lines seem to be in excess of 80 characters.

I guess some of these weren't introduces by you, but if someone is going
to fix this, he might as well take care of these.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Next
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: psql and output from \?