Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Date
Msg-id 200203112300.g2BN0U426225@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Wasn't it that this number had to be <= the maximum number of
> >> function args?
> 
> > Yes, they are related.  At least I think so.
> 
> They have to be exactly the same, because both are tied to the size
> of the oidvector type.

And because oidvector has to be a fixed length, we are have overhead in
increasing it?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: psql and output from \?