Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0111252257130.609-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > This is the part that threw me off.  I see in the postmaster docs under
> > > -c:
> > >       On some systems it is also possible to equivalently
> > >       use    GNU-style     long    options   in   the   form
> > >       --name=value.
> >
> > > so we would have to recommend '-c sort-mem=n.'
> >
> > --sort-mem works, period.  Read the code.
> >
> > That part of the docs is in error, evidently.
>
> Docs updated.

Please change it back.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: RPMs and regression tests (was Re: v7.2b3 packaged...)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?