Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0111252254500.609-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> --sort-mem works, period.  Read the code.
>
> That part of the docs is in error, evidently.

No it's not, unfortunately.  BSD versions of getopt, including the one we
ship as replacement, have a bug that considers any argument that starts
with '--' to be equivalent with '--' (which means end of options).

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sergio Pili
Date:
Subject: Bug in pg_get_ruledef?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?