Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

25 November 2001

• 00:43   anoncvs busted (was Re: v7.2b3 packages rebuilt ...) Tom Lane
• 03:23   Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector Tom Lane
• 06:33   Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector Lincoln Yeoh
• 07:03   Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector Dalibor Andzakovic
• 15:23   Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector Tom Lane
• 17:02   Re: [JDBC] Funny timezone shift causes failure in test suite Rene Pijlman
• 18:33   Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector Ian Barwick
• 19:33   Re: bytea/ODBC/MSAccess issue Hiroshi Inoue
• 20:13   Re: RPMs and regression tests (was Re: v7.2b3 packaged...) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:23   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:23   Bug in pg_get_ruledef? Sergio Pili
• 20:32   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:32   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:33   Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Peter Eisentraut
• 20:33   Change in rule behavior? Sergio Pili
• 21:03   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Tom Lane
• 21:03   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: Change in rule behavior? Tom Lane
• 21:33   Re: Bug in pg_get_ruledef? Tom Lane
• 22:33   Re: pg_config.h.win32 Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:33   Re: Bug in pg_get_ruledef? Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Bruce Momjian
• 23:03   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Tom Lane
• 23:03   Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector Lamar Owen
• 23:13   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? Tom Lane