Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Date
Msg-id 200111250015.fAP0Fwu02586@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > This is the part that threw me off.  I see in the postmaster docs under
> > -c:
> >       On some systems it is also possible to equivalently
> >       use    GNU-style     long    options   in   the   form
> >       --name=value.
> 
> > so we would have to recommend '-c sort-mem=n.'
> 
> --sort-mem works, period.  Read the code.
> 
> That part of the docs is in error, evidently.

Docs updated.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: anoncvs busted (was Re: v7.2b3 packages rebuilt ...)