Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?] - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0012311216510.776-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane writes:

> --- /usr/local/source/postgresql/pgsql/src/backend/main/main.c    Fri Nov 24 21:45:47 2000
> +++ /usr/local/build/pgsql-current/src/backend/main/main.c    Sat Dec 30 15:06:34 2000
>
> -#if defined(__alpha) && !defined(linux) && !defined(__FreeBSD__)
> +#if defined(__alpha) && !defined(linux) && !defined(__FreeBSD__) && !defined(__NetBSD__)
>  #include <sys/sysinfo.h>
>  #include "machine/hal_sysinfo.h"
>
> Applied, but I begin to think that we should be testing here for the
> *presence* of a Tru64 symbol, rather than the absence of a bunch of
> other OSes.  Anyone know what would be suitable?

__osf__

--
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]
Next
From: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Date:
Subject: vacuum analyze fails with latest cvs version