Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?] - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]
Date
Msg-id 6434.978236464@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]  ("Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
"Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com> writes:
>> Uh, why are you altering NS32K code in an Alpha patch?  I did not apply
>> this.

> cause egcs on NetBSD/Alpha will give lots of error during compile. we
> don't have gcc 2.95.2 on the alpha working yet.

But the proposed diff is inside #if defined(NEED_NS32K_TAS_ASM).
How can that affect an Alpha compilation at all?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas T. Thai"
Date:
Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]