Re: eeeh... buffer leak? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Lennert Buytenhek
Subject Re: eeeh... buffer leak?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0010162349300.12038-100000@mara.math.leidenuniv.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: eeeh... buffer leak?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: eeeh... buffer leak?
List pgsql-bugs
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> > ulsec=# truncate job;
> > NOTICE:  Buffer Leak: [002] (freeNext=-3, freePrev=-3, relname=job, blockNum=0,
> > flags=0xc, refcount=1 -1)
> > TRUNCATE
>
> Hmm, that's interesting.  It shouldn't be possible for PrivateRefCount
> (the last value printed) to become negative.  Can you give a sequence
> for reproducing this notice from a standing start?

Unfortunately not. I was very very surprised when I saw this (as I never
got any errors like this), and I tried to reproduce what I did, but I
didn't get this message again. (This is a pretty heavily-used database
(lots of clients via the network), so the odds of reproducing the exact
sequence of events is pretty small anyway).

By the way, this is PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on a Red Hat 6.2 box with a custom
kernel.

So.. what am I to do if I ever get this message again?



greetings,
Lennert

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: unique/references not honored when inheriting tables
Next
From: jordi.rodenas@bcn.concatel.com
Date:
Subject: Bug!!