Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0009262329210.515-100000@peter
Whole thread Raw
In response to Reimplementing permission checks for rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> What I'm thinking about doing is eliminating the "skipAcl" RTE field
> and instead adding an Oid field named something like "checkAclAs".
> The semantics of this field would be "if zero, check access permissions
> for this table using the current effective userID; but if not zero,
> check access permissions as if you are this userID".  Then the rule
> rewriter would do no access permission checks of its own, but would
> set this field appropriately in RTEs that it adds to queries.  All the
> actual permissions checking would happen in one place in the executor.

I like it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: There's the rub... (a meta note)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules