Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Reference Manual - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jose' Soares Da Silva
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Reference Manual
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.980401162615.843A-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Reference Manual  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > The point is: why EXTRACT accepts only date types ?
> > SQL92 specifies date, time, timestamp and interval.
>
> tgl=> select extract (year from date 'now');
> date_part
> ---------
>      1998
> (1 row)
> tgl=> select extract (year from datetime 'now');
> date_part
> ---------
>      1998
> (1 row)
> tgl=> select extract (year from abstime 'now');
> date_part
> ---------
>      1998
> (1 row)
> tgl=> select extract(year from timestamp 'now');
> date_part
> ---------
>      1998
> (1 row)
> tgl=> select extract (hour from timespan '5 hours');
> date_part
> ---------
>         5
> (1 row)
>
> tgl=> select extract (hour from reltime '5 hours');
> date_part
> ---------
>         5
> (1 row)
> tgl=> select extract (hour from interval '5 hours');
> date_part
> ---------
>         5
> (1 row)
>
> And,
>
> tgl=> select extract (hour from time '03:04:05');
> ERROR:  function 'time_timespan(time)' does not exist
>
> This is a known problem; will fix for v6.4.
>
>                        - Tom
>

It doesn't work for me.  Why ??

psql=> select extract (year from current_timestamp);
ERROR:  function date_part(unknown, timestamp) does not exist
psql=> select extract (hour from current_time);
ERROR:  function time_timespan(time) does not exist
psql=> select extract (minute from current_time);
ERROR:  function time_timespan(time) does not exist
psql=> select extract (second from current_time);
ERROR:  function time_timespan(time) does not exist
                                                            Ciao, Jose'


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Maurice Gittens"
Date:
Subject: Memory leak while creating indices?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: int2 negative numbers not parsed correctly