Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.1000406180256.474B-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> If it runs as a separate utility, there's no way for it to guarantee
> a dump consistent with the previous run of pg_dump, right?
If you dump your tables via pg_dump and promptly you dump LO via
pg_dumplo, IMHO you not have problem with DB consistency. In table-dump
is in columns OID which use LO-dump index.  

> So wouldn't it be better to fold pg_dumplo into pg_dump?

Yes. If I good remember, anyone plan rewrite pg_dump. Or not? If not, I can
rewrite it, because I very need good backup tools (I have important large 
databases (with LO too)). 
                    Karel



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and serial
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY