Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time... - Mailing list pgsql-general
| From | Tom Good |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time... |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.980604163303.9825A-100000@mailhost.nrnet.org Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS (Bruce Tong <zztong@laxmi.ev.net>) |
| Responses |
Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time...
Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time... |
| List | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Bruce Tong wrote:
> > > I have noticed this list has not provided effective support to PostgreSQL
> > > beginners - not just myself, but others.
> > What exactly is "effective support"?
> I have noticed a number of seemingly beginning questions go unanswered.
> Perhaps they were answered by direct mail. If so, I stand corrected.
Bruce - I have, being generally obnoxious and pushy, asked for a newbie
list for people like me-self: slow on the uptake but persistent.
I have heard nothing back, except from Jose who liked the idea and
apparently was willing to serve as a dispenser of info (which he does
very well.)
I would love such a list and would be willing to do whatever it takes,
workwise, to make it a reality. Scrappy!? Is this possible?
> > How many ppl actually read the documentation before posting the
> I can't answer that, and you know it. In my case, I've read everything I
> can find. I just got v6.3.2 so maybe theres a few I haven't found yet. If
> I ask a question answered in the docs, please point it out, just don't
> ignore the question. I'm happy to do the research.
I read and re=read and even re-read but have had to basically d.i.y.
except for some help from Tom (Linux questions) and Michael (major source
of help for ecpg.) My questions are painfully-newbie and belong on a
separate list...
> > Lists are meant to be "self-help"...my general day right now is
> > spent, more often then not, scanning through the subjects, reading those
> I understand, and I'm not picking on a specific person here. I know that's
> the way it is. Perhaps I'm spoiled by other lists.
I'm willing to work! Dang it - I'm willing to help. Bruce, you willing
to help if we can convince pgsql.org to let it transpire?
> > > easier. At this point, early in my PostgreSQL experience, I would say
> > > documentation is your weak suit.
> > Have you looked at what is included in v6.3.2?
>
> Yes. As I said before, I've read everything I can find. That doesn't mean
> it all made sense at first to me or that there aren't holes. This is my
> first foray into SQL databases and database administration and I'm certain
> I'm missing all sorts of details.
Bruce - I have a tgz file that you can download if you're interested
in what I have been able to do with perl/pgsql:
www.panix.com/~ugd
It's primitive but it works...there is a readme and links to archives
(for perl modules), examples of code, and so on...handy stuff.
Let me know if I can help in any way!
Cheers,
Tom
===================================================================
User Guide Dog Database Project
===================================================================
Project Coordinator: Peter J. Puckall <ppuckall@cableregina.com>
Programmers:
C/Perl: Paul Anderson <paul@geeky1.ebtech.net>
SQL/Perl: Tom Good <tomg@q8.nrnet.org>
HTML: Chris House <csh@geocities.com>
SQL/Perl: Phil R. Lawrence <prl2@lehigh.edu>
Perl: Mike List <troll@net-link.net>
Progress 4GL: Robert March <rmarch@hawk.igs.net>
===================================================================
Powered by PostgreSQL 6.3.2 // DBI-0.91::DBD-PG-0.69 // Perl5
===================================================================
pgsql-general by date: