Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.62.0504051932560.15865@ra.sai.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?  (Tom Lane)
Responses Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?  (Tom Lane)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Robert Treat <> writes:
>> While it is useless in this example, istm it only makes things more
>> confusing to require return in some cases but not in others.  Is there
>> some technical advantage to dropping it?
>
> It's about the same either way as far as the code is concerned.  But
> I've only written a dozen or so plpgsql functions using OUT parameters,
> and I've already found having to write a useless RETURN to be tedious
> (not to mention that I forgot it a couple times).  I don't think I'll be
> the last one complaining if we leave in the requirement.
>
> Basically the requirement exists to make sure you don't forget to define
> the return value.  But when you're using OUT parameters, the existence
> of a RETURN statement has nothing to do with defining the return value.

what if not require RETURN iff OUT parameter is defined ?


>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to )
>
    Regards,        Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: , http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?