On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Steve Wolfe wrote:
> The tough part is syncronicity, should one of the machines drop out of the
> cluster and need to be re-added without bringing the others down. In order
> to get around that, each query needs to be logged on the master node with a
> timestamp, so that the failed node can "catch up" in real-time. That brings
> about other considerations, as well....
Exactly! Thats also why I have decided not to implement that feature as
the deadline is in 3 weeks ;) If a database server fails it is simple
discarded from the cluster and can only be reconnected by taking the
system offline and doing the syncronisation manually.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
