Re: Harddisk performance degrading over time? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alex Pilosov
Subject Re: Harddisk performance degrading over time?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.10.10106241825330.9446-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Harddisk performance degrading over time?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Harddisk performance degrading over time?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Oh yeah,
> > vacuuming is not the problem here.
> >
> > Thanks anyway... :)
> >
> > And also, it seems that it is the indexed searches that is suffering the
> > most. The non-indexed searches is less affected. This is not only PostgreSQL
> > but also MySQL.
>
> I know the BSD filesystems are self-defragmenting.  I don't know if the
> ext2 filesystems are the same.  Surely someone must know.
Not exactly, BSD ffs (fast filesystem) isn't self-defragmenting, it just
fragments differently [less than] ext2 :)

See this for paper and some tools to get ffs fragmentation stats:
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~margo/usenix.195
(it has links to critique of the paper as well)

There's a tool ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/defrag/ to defrag ext2
filesystem, but its considered to be alpha quality and not really
maintained.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Åkerud
Date:
Subject: RE: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Harddisk performance degrading over time?