(Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Pilosov
Subject (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.10.10106152331010.17529-200000@spider.pilosoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] inet << indexability  (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>)
Responses Re: (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is
clean...I promise, I'll get better at this.

-alex

On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:

> This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types.
> 
> Please take a look at it. 
> 
> Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type
> can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected
> result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked. 
> 
> I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not
> commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to
> check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to
> know too.
> 
> -alex
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lincoln Yeoh
Date:
Subject: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Next
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords