Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is
> clean...I promise, I'll get better at this.
>
> -alex
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:
>
> > This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types.
> >
> > Please take a look at it.
> >
> > Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type
> > can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected
> > result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked.
> >
> > I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not
> > commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to
> > check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to
> > know too.
> >
> > -alex
> >
Content-Description:
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
