Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.44.0301071743470.37989-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:

> This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
>
> What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.

FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.

On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less than the normal
traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming audio uses up even more than
that.

Vince.
-- Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond!  http://www.pop4.net/  http://www.meanstreamradio.com
http://www.unknown-artists.com       Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage
Next
From: Greg Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?