Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Copeland
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id 1041980536.29933.2.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:46, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
> 
> > This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
> >
> > What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.
> 
> FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
> 
> On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less than the normal
> traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming audio uses up even more than
> that.
> 
> Vince.


I guess I don't understand the problem.  The ads are very small and
completely innocuous.  Why would anyone care?  Who's complaining and
why?


-- 
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
Copeland Computer Consulting



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?