On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > I don't see what the problem is of dumping out the entire content of
> > pg_shadow into a flat file. First you look for a non-@ user, then you
> > look for an @ user that matches the database.
>
> While I'd prefer that approach myself, the way Bruce is proposing does
> have a definite advantage: there is no problem with confusion between
> global users and database-local users of the same username. "foo@" is
> global, "foo" is not.
>
> My own feeling is that the confusion argument is a weak one, and that
> not having to use "@" to log in as a global user would be worth having
> to avoid duplicating global and local names. But I'm not sufficiently
> excited about it to volunteer to do the work ;-)
Here we go again. I thought you just said that the @ wouldn't be
something a user would have to do. I understood that to be any user.
It's back to ugly again.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com http://www.meanstreamradio.com
http://www.unknown-artists.com
==========================================================================
