Re: Re: [BUGS] LockReplace: xid table corrupted - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Jie Liang
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] LockReplace: xid table corrupted
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0012121005550.25634-100000@jliang.ipinc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] LockReplace: xid table corrupted  (Dronamraju Rajesh <drajesh80@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-admin
I remember that you cannot open more than 16 sessiones at same time
by default, if more than that you have to reset, I believe you can
find how from documentation.


Jie LIANG

Internet Products Inc.

10350 Science Center Drive
Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121
Office:(858)320-4873

jliang@ipinc.com
www.ipinc.com

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Dronamraju Rajesh wrote:

> thanks tom....But strange thing is that my database
> has only 15 tables totally...which are very small
> too...
>
> so how would be the way of me reaching to 1000
> tables???
>
> and why do i get an error message "sorry too many
> clients" ???
>
> Regards
> Rajesh
> --- Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Dronamraju Rajesh <drajesh80@yahoo.com> writes:
> > > database:- Postgres 6.5.2 ( pl dont suggest to
> > upgrade
> > > to 7.0.2. once this problem is solved. then i can
> > do
> > > testing of my app with postgres 7.0.2)
> >
> > If you update to 7.0.3, you'll probably find this
> > problem
> > goes away.  It sounds to me like you are running
> > into a bogus
> > debug check in the older code that assumed
> > LockRelease should
> > never need to release more than a thousand locks.
> >
> > If you don't want to update, try not touching 1000
> > tables in
> > the same transaction.  I'm guessing you do a lot of
> > large-object
> > slinging ... otherwise it's not that easy to get to
> > 1000 ...
> >
> >             regards, tom lane
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Foriegn key constraint
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: users work now with PostgreSQL