Re: pl/Perl - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Jie Liang
Subject Re: pl/Perl
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.10103140856100.62546-100000@tidal.ipinc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/Perl  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pl/Perl  (Richard H <dev@archonet.com>)
Re: pl/Perl  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-sql
Tom,

1.Where or how I can get pltcl.so? I have not find this file anywhere in
my
source except a pltcl.c.
2.Dose installation same as plpgsql?
i.e.
CREATE FUNCTION pltcl_call_handler () RETURNS OPAQUE AS         '/usr/local/pgsql/lib/pltcl.so' LANGUAGE 'C';
CREATE TRUSTED PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE 'pltcl'         HANDLER pltcl_call_handler         LANCOMPILER 'PL/pgtcl';
3.Where I can find more doc about pltcl?


Thanks for your time.

           
Jie LIANG

St. Bernard Software

10350 Science Center Drive
Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121
Office:(858)320-4873

jliang@ipinc.com
www.stbernard.com
www.ipinc.com

On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Jie Liang <jliang@ipinc.com> writes:
> > My choice:
> > if involving a lot of regular expressions, pl/Perl is better;
> > if involving a lot of SQLs or other functions(or store procedures),
> > then pl/pgsql is better. 
> 
> Also consider pltcl, which has pretty nearly perl-equivalent regexp
> support, and can do queries too.  Besides which it's easier to build/
> install than plperl.
> 
> It's a shame that plperl doesn't yet have support for making queries.
> It hasn't really progressed much past the proof-of-concept stage IMHO,
> but no one is working on it :-(
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL "compilation error"
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL "compilation error"