RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies Inc)
Subject RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607
Date
Msg-id PH8PR21MB3902C10CE3A1B07FE8C3EEF2E5F82@PH8PR21MB3902.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607
List pgsql-bugs
Thanks, Thomas. I would leave the questions to Vishwa and Rahul to answer.

Regards!
Haifang

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 2:22 PM
To: Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies Inc) <v-haiwang@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rahul Pandey <pandeyrah@microsoft.com>; Vishwa Deepak <Vishwa.Deepak@microsoft.com>; Shawn Steele
<Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>;Amy Wishnousky <amyw@microsoft.com>; Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>;
pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org;Shweta Gulati <gulatishweta@microsoft.com>; Ashish Nawal <nawalashish@microsoft.com>
 
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 1:00 AM Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies
Inc) <v-haiwang@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Just would like to follow up with you about this bug. Hope Rahul and Vishwa have answered all your questions below.
Didyou get chance to do investigations? Any other questions?
 

Hi,

Thanks for all your feedback!  Sorry for my late replies, I was travelling and at a conference last week (at which one
ofthe topics was "what are we going to do about the sorry state of PostgreSQL on Windows", but that's a wider topic
thanthis thread...)
 

The answers are all useful, thank you.  There was just one thing I wanted to clarify.  Vishwa said:

"Yes, its exactly the same code and driving data , only spelling is changed which included replcement of u with ü"

That sounds like it is answering the question 'Do "Turkish_Turkey.1254" and "Turkish_Türkiye.1254" behave
identically?',which I had already assumed to be true, but I was actually asking 'Do ""Turkish_Turkey.1254",
"Turkish_Türkiye.1254"and "tr-TR.1254" all behave identically?'.  It sounds like the answer is probably yes, but the
mentionof "u" vs "ü" implied a narrower answer than I was looking for...  It's important, because we're proposing to
translateto "tr-TR.1254".
 

Since no one has come forward to test the patch I wrote on Windows, I think my next move will be to try to make a build
optionthat can also do locale name renaming on Unix, so that I have something that I could test myself and push for the
nextrelease of PostgreSQL which will be in October.
 

One open question is whether we should ship a translation file ourselves.  I have heard two opinions: Tom Lane proposed
inthis thread that there should be no file initially, we let the user figure out what to put in there.  Magnus Hagander
proposedat the pgconf.dev conference last week that we should ideally ship a complete translation file and maintain it
overtime, and it should be installed not in pgdata but rather in the install directory.  I am not personally able or
willingto maintain such a file, I'm only offering to supply the C code to read it and do what it says, but perhaps a
groupsuch as the EDB Installer maintainer group, or at least someone with a vested interest in PostgreSQL on Windows,
mightlike to own that job.
 

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18365: Inconsistent cost function between materialized and non-materialized CTE
Next
From: "Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies Inc)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607