Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From James Pang (chaolpan)
Subject RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
Date
Msg-id PH0PR11MB519109C0DD5E9CCAE097952BD6409@PH0PR11MB5191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Tree view

 

Please check attached.

 

Thanks,

James

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 3:05 PM
To: James Pang (chaolpan) <chaolpan@cisco.com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete

 

> > Yesterday, when workload test, a lot of Postgresql JDBC connections
> > use 150-160MB memory , so we got ERROR: out of memory

Would you please share a reproducer? (e.g. DDL for the table, test code)

 

Have you tried capturing memory context information for the backend that consumes memory?

Attachment

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "James Pang (chaolpan)"
Date:
Subject: Recall: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
Next
From: "James Pang (chaolpan)"
Date:
Subject: Recall: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete