Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-HuM6t=8kiVCnqAisk3PfO9y7HmKWpzjCyDZWMXaeA5vg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete  ("James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan@cisco.com>)
Responses RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
List pgsql-jdbc
Tree view
> > Yesterday, when workload test, a lot of Postgresql JDBC connections
> > use 150-160MB memory , so we got ERROR: out of memory

Would you please share a reproducer? (e.g. DDL for the table, test code)

Have you tried capturing memory context information for the backend that consumes memory?

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "James Pang (chaolpan)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
Next
From: "James Pang (chaolpan)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete