RE: Force streaming every change in logical decoding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Subject | RE: Force streaming every change in logical decoding |
Date | |
Msg-id | OSZPR01MB6310AAE12BC281158880380DFDEB9@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 4:54 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:55 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 6:22 PM Masahiko Sawada > <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 7:49 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:46 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) > > > > <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear hackers, > > > > > > > > > > > We have discussed three different ways to provide GUC for these > > > > > > features. (1) Have separate GUCs like force_server_stream_mode, > > > > > > force_server_serialize_mode, force_client_serialize_mode (we can > use > > > > > > different names for these) for each of these; (2) Have two sets of > > > > > > GUCs for server and client. We can have logical_decoding_mode with > > > > > > values as 'stream' and 'serialize' for the server and then > > > > > > logical_apply_serialize = true/false for the client. (3) Have one GUC > > > > > > like logical_replication_mode with values as 'server_stream', > > > > > > 'server_serialize', 'client_serialize'. > > > > > > > > > > I also agreed for adding new GUC parameters (and I have already done > partially > > > > > in parallel apply[1]), and basically options 2 made sense for me. But is > it OK > > > > > that we can choose "serialize" mode even if subscribers require > streaming? > > > > > > > > > > Currently the reorder buffer transactions are serialized on publisher > only when > > > > > the there are no streamable transaction. So what happen if the > > > > > logical_decoding_mode = "serialize" but streaming option streaming is > on? If we > > > > > break the first one and serialize changes on publisher anyway, it may > be not > > > > > suitable for testing the normal operation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the change will be streamed as soon as the next change is > > > > processed even if we serialize based on this option. See > > > > ReorderBufferProcessPartialChange. However, I see your point that > when > > > > the streaming option is given, the value 'serialize' for this GUC may > > > > not make much sense. > > > > > > > > > Therefore, I came up with the variant of (2): logical_decoding_mode > can be > > > > > "normal" or "immediate". > > > > > > > > > > "normal" is a default value, which is same as current HEAD. Changes > are streamed > > > > > or serialized when the buffered size exceeds > logical_decoding_work_mem. > > > > > > > > > > When users set to "immediate", the walsenders starts to stream or > serialize all > > > > > changes. The choice is depends on the subscription option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The other possibility to achieve what you are saying is that we allow > > > > a minimum value of logical_decoding_work_mem as 0 which would > mean > > > > stream or serialize each change depending on whether the streaming > > > > option is enabled. I think we normally don't allow a minimum value > > > > below a certain threshold for other *_work_mem parameters (like > > > > maintenance_work_mem, work_mem), so we have followed the same > here. > > > > And, I think it makes sense from the user's perspective because below > > > > a certain threshold it will just add overhead by either writing small > > > > changes to the disk or by sending those over the network. However, it > > > > can be quite useful for testing/debugging. So, not sure, if we should > > > > restrict setting logical_decoding_work_mem below a certain threshold. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > I agree with (2), having separate GUCs for publisher side and > > > subscriber side. Also, on the publisher side, Amit's idea, controlling > > > the logical decoding behavior by changing logical_decoding_work_mem, > > > seems like a good idea. > > > > > > But I'm not sure it's a good idea if we lower the minimum value of > > > logical_decoding_work_mem to 0. I agree it's helpful for testing and > > > debugging but setting logical_decoding_work_mem = 0 doesn't benefit > > > users at all, rather brings risks. > > > > > > I prefer the idea Kuroda-san previously proposed; setting > > > logical_decoding_mode = 'immediate' means setting > > > logical_decoding_work_mem = 0. We might not need to have it as an > enum > > > parameter since it has only two values, though. > > > > Did you mean one GUC (logical_decoding_mode) will cause a side-effect > > implicit value change on another GUC value > > (logical_decoding_work_mem)? > > > > I don't think that is required. The only value that can be allowed for > logical_decoding_mode will be "immediate", something like we do for > recovery_target. The default will be "". The "immediate" value will > mean that stream each change if the "streaming" option is enabled > ("on" of "parallel") or if "streaming" is not enabled then that would > mean serializing each change. > I agreed and updated the patch as Amit suggested. Please see the attached patch. Regards, Shi yu
Attachment
pgsql-hackers by date: