RE: Dropped and generated columns might cause wrong data on subs when REPLICA IDENTITY FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Dropped and generated columns might cause wrong data on subs when REPLICA IDENTITY FULL
Date
Msg-id OSZPR01MB6310A7627F4587CB5547086AFDBC9@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dropped and generated columns might cause wrong data on subs when REPLICA IDENTITY FULL  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Dropped and generated columns might cause wrong data on subs when REPLICA IDENTITY FULL  (Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 5:23 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 6:26 PM Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Attaching v2
> >
> 
> Can we change the comment to: "Ignore dropped and generated columns as
> the publisher doesn't send those."? After your change, att =
> TupleDescAttr(slot1->tts_tupleDescriptor, attrnum); is done twice in
> the same function.
> 
> In test cases, let's change the comment to: "The bug was that when the
> REPLICA IDENTITY FULL is used with dropped or generated columns, we
> fail to apply updates and deletes.". Also, I think we don't need to
> provide the email link as anyway commit message will have a link to
> the discussion.
> 
> Did you check this in the back branches?
> 

I tried to reproduce this bug in backbranch.

Generated column is introduced in PG12, and I reproduced generated column problem
in PG12~PG15.

For dropped column problem, I reproduced it in PG10~PG15. (Logical replication
was introduced in PG10)

So I think we should backpatch the fix for generated column to PG12, and
backpatch the fix for dropped column to PG10.

Regards,
Shi Yu

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Add a hook to allow modification of the ldapbindpasswd
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Support load balancing in libpq