On Monday, October 17, 2022 6:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:41 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-Oct-17, Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 6:43 PM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm not sure that ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR is the right thing here;
> > > > sounds like ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED might be more
> appropriate.
> > >
> > > I thought maybe ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE, which
> > > would make it the same as similar messages in the same function when
> > > incompatible parameters are specified.
> >
> > Hmm, yeah, I guess that's also a possibility.
> >
>
> Right, ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE seems to suite better
> here.
Agreed. Here is new version patch which changed the error code and
moved the whole command out of the message according to Álvaro's comment.
Best regards,
Hou zj
