On Sunday, July 31, 2022 12:12 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 01:13:52PM +0000, houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > I am not against returning the objaddr for cases related to RLS and
> RelOption.
> > But just to confirm, do you have a use case to use the returned
> > address(relation itself) for RLS or RelOptions in event trigger ? I
> > asked this because when I tried to deparse the subcommand of ALTER
> > TABLE. It seems enough to use the information inside the parse tree to
> deparse the RLS and RelOptions related subcommands.
>
> You are right here, there is little point in returning the relation itself. I have
> removed these modifications, added a couple of extra commands for some
> extra coverage, and applied all that. I have finished by splitting the extension
> of test_ddl_deparse/ and the addition of ObjectAddress for the attach/detach
> into their own commit, mainly for clarity.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Hou Zhijie
